Tag Archives: washington

Get to work, Washington!


We hear from all corners that the fiscal cliff, the dual whammy of deep spending cuts and higher tax rates set to kick in if Congress and the White House can’t agree to a budget plan, will hurt the economy. But just how much of a dent will it cause?

Today on Squawk, we got some answers from the National Association of Manufacturers. Already, the deadlock in Washington is causing some major concern among the nation’s manufacturers. Optimism among this group has plunged over the last nine months, according to the group’s latest survey. In March over 88% of those surveyed were feeling good about the economy; now, that number is just above 51%.

Why is a drop like that such a big deal? Because manufacturers employ 12 million people in the United States, and how they are feeling will determine whether they hire more workers – or fire them.

Here’s a couple of other concerning stats:

  • This group now expects to see their sales increase by just 1% over the next year. Back in March, they were looking for sales gains of 4.7%.
  • As a result, manufacturers are now planning on spending less. In fact, their predictions on capital expenditures have now turned negative for the first time since the fourth quarter of 2009.
  • The same goes for hiring. 36.2% say they have either stopped hiring or even cut their employment as a result.

Bottom line: It’s bad news. And good reason for Washington to get to work.

Tomorrow, I’m Going to Buy Legal Weed


Elan Nelson, a cannabis industry consultant, looks over Medicine Man‘s cannabis inventory in anticipation of a high-volume sales day.

Weed has already been legal in Colorado and Washington state for more than a year, only there’s exactly nowhere to legally buy it, unless you’re an approved medical marijuana patient. Tomorrow, however, that’s going to change, dramatically, when America‘s first retail marijuana stores open their doors to anyone 21-and-over, no matter where you live, and without a note from your doctor.

This slow rollout of legal pot began back in November 2012, when voters heartily approved two separate ballot initiatives that immediately ended criminal penalties for adult marijuana possession, while mandating the creation of statewide regulations governing commercial cultivation and distribution. Now, after a long and often contentious political process, Colorado has at last fully licensed 136 marijuana retailers, 178 cultivation facilities, 31 infused-product manufacturers (who make everything from cannabis chocolates to BHO), and three laboratories charged with testing all of these intoxicants for potency and potential contamination.

The first of these stores will open in less than 24 hours, and naturally I’ll be there, cash in hand, and most likely a tear in my eye. Even if it means standing in line for hours in the freezing cold. Because after more than a decade spent reporting on cannabis from the front lines, I desperately want to witness the beginning of the end of America’s longest, stupidest war. Though I also know I’ll look back some day and find myself filled with nostalgia for the outlaw days of yore. Before big business and corporate cannabis ever muscled in on our turf.

The author, inside Medicine Man’s green milegrow room.

Countdown to Burn Down

Marijuana is not anti-establishment because it’s illegal. It’s illegal because it’s anti-establishment. Or so I’ve believed ever since taking my first illicit toke as a teenager. But what if a certain willingness to question authority, long associated with smoking herb, comes to us not from any of the plant’s inherent properties, but from its prohibition?

I know I first started seriously questioning authority based on the vast discrepancy between my own adolescent high times and the anti-pot propaganda ads on television. Looking back now, in fact, I have my own competing gateway theory. I believe that, for myself and many others, marijuana serves as the gateway social justice issue of our time. A form of arbitrary oppression so egregious and ubiquitous that even a white, suburban teenager can experience the violence inherent in the system firsthand.

In Larry “Ratso” Sloman‘s book Reefer Madness (1998), for example, beat poet laureate Allen Ginsberg related his own personal gateway experience, a life-altering epiphany that took place the very first time he got baked.

When I smoked grass I suddenly realized how amazing it was that on the evidence of my own senses, which I did not doubt, here was a very mild stimulator of perception that led me into all sorts of awes and cosmic vibrations and appreciations of Cezanne and Renaissance paintings and color and tastes. And here was this great big government plot to suppress it and make it seem as if it were something diabolic, satanic, full of hatred and fiendishness and madness… It was the very first time I ever had solid evidence in my own body that there was a difference between reality as I saw it myself and reality as it was described officially by the state, the government, the police and the media. From then on I realized that marijuana was going to be an enormous political catalyst, because anybody who got high would immediately see through the official hallucination that had been laid down and would begin questioning, “What is this War? What is the military budget?”

Ginsberg went on to form the first pro-marijuana lobbying and activism organization in America, an effort duly noted in his Federal Bureau of Narcotics file.

On December 27, 1964, GINSBERG and _____ marched in front of the Department of Welfare Building… with signs reading “Smoke Pot, It’s Cheaper and Healthier Than Liquor,” and “Pot Is a Reality Kick.” These individuals are members of an organization called LEMAR (Legalize Marijuana) and their names appear in the files of Interpol.

Nearly 50 years later, those first green shoots of organized resistance have finally cracked through the pavement, for all the world to see. To celebrate, I spent a day in Denver touring the (sigh) Mile High City’s retail cannabis stores and cultivation facilities as they prepare to make history.

Back when I first started working this beat, pot reporters wore blindfolds on the way to a “stash house” or a “grow operation,” or better yet we rode in the trunk of the car, so as not to compromise the safety our sources, but nowadays, I’m far more likely to meet the head of a marijuana private equity firm for drinks at an upscale hotel bar. I’ll let you guess which scenario makes for a more enjoyable afternoon.

Julie Berliner, proprietress of Sweet Grass Kitchen, prepares a batch of pot-infused brownies.

Wake and Bakery

First stop on the pot tour: Sweet Grass Kitchen, a Denver-based edibles bakery, where owner and operator Julie Berliner greets me with a plate of pot-less pot cookies, so I can sample her merchandise for breakfast without missing my next three appointments.

Julie started up the company way back in the “wild west” days of 2008, when supplying medical marijuana patients with cannabis-infused food required little more than a home kitchen and the nerve to do it. Now she operates a licensed commercial kitchen that employs two full-time bakers, with plans to expand into cultivation as well, so she can produce enough cannabis in-house to supply her growing business.

Sweet Grass won’t be selling their THC-laden cookies, brownies, and pies in any of the retail pot stores when they open tomorrow, however. Mostly because Colorado’s exploding dab scene makes sourcing enough marijuana trim to make enough cannabutter to supply 75 medical marijuana centers an ongoing challenge, never mind expanding into the recreational market. Hence the 40-light grow room currently under construction. All part of the $300,000 investment she’s made in the business since serious regulations kicked in three years ago.

So does Julie miss the carefree days before pot fell fully under the government’s thumb?

“In ways, yes,” She admits. “But back then I was always incredibly anxious. We could have lost everything in a crackdown. And meanwhile, I would wake up some mornings to discover I was breaking a new law that just passed.”

Medicine Man’s budtenders prepare to start selling their wares over the counter.

Growing Pains

Twenty construction workers hammer and saw around the clock at one of just a dozen or so retail marijuana stores fully licensed to open tomorrow in Denver. It’s like some dumb reality show where they remodel a restaurant in 24 hours, only we’re talking converting a medical marijuana center into a “dual-use facility” that also sells recreational pot. So perhaps we should call it an altered-reality show.

Elan Nelson, a leading cannabis industry consultant, takes me on a tour of Medicine Man’s 20,000 square-foot facility, including a fully stocked sales counter and a massive grow operation in the back. Elan describes herself as a “once-a-year” herb smoker, who entered the pot industry seeking an exciting career path with serious upside potential.

Then she learned it’s a lot more.

“At one of my first jobs, a customer came in to buy medical marijuana legally and told me he’d just gotten out of jail after serving several years on a pot charge. That made me realize just how much people have suffered for this, something I never experienced directly.”

Meanwhile, ever since they were among the first to announce a January 1 opening for recreational sales, Medicine Man has been inundated with reporters. So as we stop to chat with the dozens of diligent employees that make this place hum along like a hash-oiled machine, Elan takes care to inform them that I actually know a thing or two about getting high—as apparently the vast majority of my colleagues in the media haven’t got a clue.

At our last tour stop, one of Medicine Man’s top budtenders sets off my jaydar as a guy who got into this thing of ours sometime before selling lots and lots of marijuana was quite so legal. So I ask if he ever fondly recalls the black market?

“Working here is way more uplifting and way less stressful,” my source asserts while setting out huge jars of top-shelf herb for me to sniff. “I don’t have to worry about who’s following me home. Or doing business with the kind of people I’d really rather not know.”

Toni Fox, of 3D Cannabis Center, gazes into the bright future of legal marijuana.

High Demand

“What’s ‘an eighth?’”

Toni Fox suppresses a wry smile before explaining to a German reporter that one eighth of an ounce serves as a standard unit of measure in the underground ganja world. And so, in order to undercut that very same black market, her 3D Cannabis Center will offer a wide variety of high-quality eighths at prices ranging from $35 to $50 pre-taxes. Sixty different strains in all are grown on-site. Customers can even check out 3D’s 14,000 square-foot cultivation operation in the back through a specially designed viewing window.

Toni then informs me that she doesn’t harbor any nostalgia whatsoever for the outlaw days of marijuana. Nor does her brother, who spent ten years in prison over probably less pot than her store will sell tomorrow.

Between now and then, the shop’s closed for final preparations. Including making arrangements to deal with the hundreds of eager cannabis enthusiasts from around the world expected to start lining up outside hours before the big grand opening.

Including me.

After all, wild rumors have been flying around town about immediate supply shortages, and I’d surely hate to miss out. Toni assures me she’s got enough product on hand to make it to the end of the week at the very least, and hopefully well into February, without having to dramatically raise prices or take other drastic measures.

But why take the risk of showing up late to the greatest pot party of all time?

Can’t make it to Colorado? Check VICE.com tomorrow for further adventures in search of legal weed.

http://www.vice.com/read/tomorrow-im-going-to-buy-legal-weed

 

Science fiction doesn’t predict the future, it creates the future


While most people believe SF’s power comes from the genre’s predictions, the truth is far more subtle

Science fiction is dead. Long live science fiction.

Before you ask, yes, both those statements are true. Science fiction as understood by most people—as the gleaming predictor of the future—has been dead for decades.

Of course, to state that SF isn’t about predicting the future is tantamount to heresy among many genre fans. Last year I sat on a convention panel where, after stating my view on SF predictions, a fellow panelist began yelling at me. While I didn’t appreciate the scream-fest, I understood why he was upset. Saying you disagree with the predictive powers of science fiction is almost like questioning someone’s religion and often produces similar screams of anguish.

So let me be clear—I’m not dismissing the importance of ideas and technology in science fiction. Science fiction is the most penetrating of all literary genres precisely because it deals with the two aspects of humanity—ideas and technology—which truly make us human. Be the ideas as revolutionary as monetary exchange and farming, or the technology as simply as a hand axe and spear, without ideas and technology humanity would never have become human. And these two concepts are still shaping humanity into new and exciting directions, a phenomenon science fiction is perfectly situated to explore.

But all of that, of course, isn’t what pops into the popular mind when you mention science fiction. Instead, to most people science fiction is about predicting the future.

While this prediction fallacy has been around since nearly the beginning of the science fiction genre, it first gained significant power in the U.S.A. with the launch of Sputnik, the world’s first artificial satellite. Sputnik caused many Americans to feel their country had fallen behind in the technology and space race with the Soviet Union.

But where the general public felt panic, those who loved science fiction saw an opportunity.

You see, until then science fiction had been firmly locked inside the ghetto of kids’ literature. Never mind that tons of adults read science fiction—the genre simply wasn’t given any respect. To say that science fiction in the 1940s and early ’50s was held in as low regard as pornography wouldn’t be stretching the truth too much; in fact, quite a few people back then probably would have regarded pornography as being classier than science fiction. After all, you could understand why people looked at pornography. But adults reading those kiddie books? That was just weird.

But after Sputnik, all those people who’d decried science fiction were now worried about kids learning about science and technology so the great U.S. of A could beat those nasty communists. And what better way to convince the youth of today to become the scientists of tomorrow than to interest them in science fiction.

Suddenly SF was respectable. And as rockets, moon landings, satellites and other technological advances became ingrained in the public’s mind, lovers of science fiction lost no time in pointing out that their beloved genre had seen all of this coming decades before.

Which they had. In a way. So suddenly the true value of SF was about predicting the future.

Unfortunately, once SF became about predicting the future too many people forgot the deeper role of the genre in exploring how ideas and technology make us human.

Since then the genre has partly moved away from this simplistic view of SF, a transition jump started by the New Wave movement of the 1960s and ’70s. However, the public’s view of the genre has remained stuck in a moon-landing time frame. As a result, you continually hear people both in and outside the genre wondering if science fiction is still relevant when technological advances happen faster than SF can predict.

Short answer: if you believe SF is about predicting the future, then yes, the genre is indeed dead.

But if you believe the genre is instead about creating the future, about understanding where humanity is going, then science fiction is alive and well.

One of the most insightful genre essays I’ve read in recent years is “A Vocabulary for Speaking about the Future” by award-winning SF author Cory Doctorow. In the essay Doctorow, author of such novels as the best-seller Little Brother, rightly dismisses the idea of science fiction predicting the future.

Instead, he says that while SF authors may think they’re predicting the future—such as with previous so-called SF predictions like the Web, flip-phones, waterbeds, rocketships and robots—the truth is that in “nearly every instance where science fiction has successfully ‘predicted’ a turn of events, it’s more true to say that it has inspired that turn of events.”

As an example, Doctorow cites the Motorola flip-phone, which resembled the Star Trek communicators from the 1960’s TV show. But Star Trek didn’t predict the flip-phone. Instead, the engineers at Motorola were fans of Star Trek and modeled their phone after communicators in their favorite series.

I believe Doctorow’s view of SF predictions is correct—SF inspires the future instead of predicting it. And Doctorow doesn’t stop there. As he states, “the really interesting thing is how science fiction does its best tricks: through creating the narrative vocabularies by which futures can be debated, discussed, adopted, or discarded.”

Doctorow gives George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four as an example of what this type of futuristic verbal judo can accomplish. Before Orwell’s famous novel, it was difficult to discuss the dangers of an overreaching surveillance-based state. But after Orwell, not only does humanity have the words to express these dangers—Orwellian and Big Brother are two such words which jump to mind—we also have the larger story of Nineteen Eighty-Four to help us comprehend and process these words.

So forget about science fiction predicting the future. Such a belief arose because it was useful for a while during the genre’s history, not because it was correct.

Instead, the science fiction genre inspires the future. SF creates the future. And that’s more powerful than any prediction will ever be.


Jason Sanford is a Nebula Award nominated author whose science fiction stories have been published in a number of magazines and books, including Interzone, Asimov’s and Analog. Follow his Sci-Fi Strange Medium collection at https://medium.com/sci-fi-strange.

Written by

A science fiction take on life in our SF-inspired world. Learn more about Jason at www.jasonsanford.com.

 

Exclusive: U.S. government urged to name CEO to run Obamacare market


By David Morgan

WASHINGTON Sun Dec 29, 2013 7:11am EST

Supporters of the Affordable Healthcare Act gather in front of the Supreme Court before the court's announcement of the legality of the law in Washington on June 28, 2012. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Supporters of the Affordable Healthcare Act gather in front of the Supreme Court before the court’s announcement of the legality of the law in Washington on June 28, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Joshua Roberts

(Reuters) – The White House is coming under pressure from some of its closest allies on healthcare reform to name a chief executive to run its federal health insurance marketplace and allay the concerns of insurers after the rocky rollout of Obamacare.

Advocates have been quietly pushing the idea of a CEO who would set marketplace rules, coordinate with insurers and state regulators on the health plans offered for sale, supervise enrollment campaigns and oversee technology, according to several sources familiar with discussions between advocates and the Obama administration.

Supporters of the idea say it could help regain the trust of insurers and others whose confidence in the healthcare overhaul has been shaken by the technological woes that crippled the federal HealthCare.gov insurance shopping website and the flurry of sometimes-confusing administration rule changes that followed.

The advocates include former White House adviser Ezekiel Emanuel, the brother of President Barack Obama’s former chief of staff Rahm Emanuel, and the Center for American Progress, the Washington think tank founded by John Podesta, the president’s newly appointed senior counselor.

The White House is not embracing the idea of creating a CEO, administration officials said.

“This isn’t happening. It’s not being considered,” a senior administration official told Reuters.

Some healthcare reform allies say the complexity of the federal marketplace requires a CEO-type figure with clear authority and knowledge of how insurance markets work.

Obama’s healthcare overhaul aims to provide health coverage to millions of uninsured or under-insured Americans by offering private insurance at federally subsidized rates through new online health insurance marketplaces in all 50 states and in Washington, D.C.

Only 14 states opted to create and operate their own exchanges, leaving the Obama administration to operate a federal marketplace for the remaining 36 states that can be accessed through HealthCare.gov.

The marketplace is now officially the responsibility of the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and its administrator, Marilyn Tavenner. Healthcare experts say there is no specific official dedicated to running the operation.

A CMS spokesman said exchange functions overlap across different groups within the agency’s Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight.

The lack of a clear decision-making hierarchy was identified as a liability months before the disastrous October 1 launch of HealthCare.gov by the consulting firm McKinsey & Co.

Obama adviser Jeffrey Zients, who rescued the website from crippling technical glitches last month, also identified the lack of effective management as a problem.

POTENTIAL CEO CANDIDATES

Former Microsoft executive Kurt DelBene has replaced Zients as website manager, at least through the first half of 2014.

“We’re fortunate that Kurt DelBene is now part of the administration – there’s no one better able to help us keep moving forward to make affordable, quality health insurance available to as many Americans as possible,” Obama healthcare adviser Phil Schiliro said in a statement to Reuters.

The White House appears, for now, to be concentrating on ironing out the remaining glitches in HealthCare.gov to ensure millions more people are able to sign up for coverage in 2014. Good enrollment numbers are seen by both critics and supporters of Obamacare as a key measure of the program’s success.

“So my sense is that they’re not thinking about appointing a CEO in the short term,” said Topher Spiro, a healthcare analyst with the Center for American Progress.

The CEO proposal calls for removing day-to-day control of the marketplace from the CMS bureaucracy and placing it under a leadership structure like those used in some of the more successful state-run marketplaces, including California.

The new team would be managed by a CEO, or an executive director, who would run the marketplace like a business and answer directly to the White House, sources familiar with the discussions say.

They point to insurance industry and healthcare veterans as potential candidates, including former Aetna CEO Ronald Williams, former Kaiser Permanente CEO George Halvorson and Jon Kingsdale, who ran the Massachusetts health exchange established under former Governor Mitt Romney‘s 2006 healthcare reforms. None of the three was available for comment.

Healthcare experts say the idea should have been taken up by the administration years ago.

“It’s the right thing to do. It’s just two years late,” said Mike Leavitt, the Republican former Utah governor who oversaw the rollout of the prescription drug program known as Medicare Part D as U.S. health and human services secretary under President George W. Bush.

“The administration is confronted by a series of problems they cannot solve on their own. They do not possess internally the competencies or the exposure or the information,” he told Reuters.

Emanuel, one of the administration’s longest-standing allies on healthcare reform, recommended a marketplace CEO in an October 22 Op-Ed article in the New York Times, calling it one of five things the White House could do to fix Obamacare.

“The candidate should have management experience, knowledge of how both the government and health insurance industry work, and at least some familiarity with IT (information technology) systems. Obviously this is a tall order, but there are such people. And the administration needs to hire one immediately,” he wrote.

The administration has adopted Emanuel’s four other recommendations: better window-shopping features for HealthCare.gov; a concerted effort to win back public trust; a focus on the customer shopping experience; and a public outreach campaign to engage young adults.

(Reporting by David Morgan in Washington; Editing by Karey Van Hall, Michele Gershberg, Ross Colvin and Will Dunham)

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/29/us-usa-healthcare-ceo-idUSBRE9BS04Y20131229

 

How To Be A Working Girl


Lessons from a city girl on how to navigate the unexpected twists and turns in your career.

It was a brisk February day when the sidewalk of Sixth Avenue exploded and set my office building on fire.

It was an unnecessary twist of dramatic irony for a company that had filed for bankruptcy only two weeks earlier. It had been my first job in New York and it lasted a mere seven months before literally going up in flames.

I had heard the company was going through some financial trouble, but I would still have a job. Money would be found. An investor would come through. But then, one day, around four o’clock, we were all brought into a conference room and told that our jobs were no longer going to exist, the company was filing Chapter 7 Bankruptcy.

There I was, at age 25, living in New York City without a paycheck, without any idea of what to do next and rent due in just two weeks.

Just when I had started to get comfortable, the rug was pulled out from under me. And I knew, that in order to make it in any big city as a financially independent woman, I had to figure out a way to pay my bills because chasing cosmopolitan dreams ain’t cheap. But at the same time, I didn’t want to sell myself short. Despite this sudden surprise, I had to continue to shoot for the moon, even if all I could do was jump from star to star.

Barista. Hostess. Secretary. Bartender. Caterer. Babysitter. Tutor. Freelance Writer. These are just a few of the jobs I have taken throughout my life to help pay the bills while I developed my professional career.

Each of these jobs taught me that there is no task too small if you want to succeed in life. From teaching kids algebra to learning how to build a perfect, foamy cappuccino to managing not to spill a full platter of champagne glasses in a crowded room — I have always taken pride in my ability to do almost anything well even if it didn’t seem to apply to my long term career goals at the time.

From these experiences, I knew I could make anything work out if I tried. I was determined not only to survive the bankruptcy, but thrive. Looking back, perhaps the only casualty of the whole experience was my future MBA. I had a GMAT test scheduled three days after the bankruptcy. Let’s just say that my MBA became less of a priority once I found myself scrambling to find a new job.

So, I did what any city girl would do. I ordered a Gin Martini and sat down to think about what I wanted to do next. Instead of turning to part-time jobs, I decided to start my own consulting business. When starting your own business — whether it is planned or spontaneous — I recommend that you outline everything you like to do and know you are good at. If you have to be your own salesperson, sell something you are passionate about doing for other people.

To get organized, I built a quick website, outlined my services, called in a favor from a lawyer to help with a business contract and within a week, I had launched.

Thanks to words of advice from a mentor who had told me to try and “never give out free advice,” I had a small business pipeline built already and through a variety of connections, I was able to pull in ten different clients while I looked for a full-time position.

I paid my rent on time and the following months turned out to be an incredible journey of self-sufficiency and adventure.

I was hired to work with artists in Soho and along the way, I got to meet Chuck Close and hear Rosanne Cash sing to a room of 20 people. From non-profits to solar companies to restaurants, I took any gig I could get to pay the bills while I pursued a full-time job in media. And some of them turned out to be really fun and meaningful.

It has been said that “luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.” I couldn’t agree more. And one day, my luck finally showed up when I ran into an acquaintance in a sandwich shop in Midtown.

“What are you up to these days?” she asked.

“I am consulting on my own, you know, doing the whole writing, marketing, communications thing,” I said to her. “But I am looking for a full-time position.”

She told me about a job open in the public relations department of TIME magazine. I was intrigued. I sent over my resume and I was asked to come in for an interview that week.

I’ll never forget walking into the lobby of the TIME-LIFE building for the first time. It was one of those feelings that made me think, “Is this really happening?”

A few days later, I got a call with a job offer to not just work for TIME, but four of the largest news brands in the world as a digital publicist. The job was a non-stop treadmill chasing the 24/7 news cycle, but it was one of the most exciting experiences I have ever had. I knew that if I put my head down, worked hard and tried to balance the demands of my boss, the executives and the editors around me, I might actually get the place I had been trying to go all this time — to become a successful working girl who didn’t need three jobs to pay the bills.

That opportunity gave me access to a world that most people only read about while sitting on their living room couch. I truly admired many of the people I worked with and I will never forget the days I spent walking through the lobby of the TIME-LIFE building. I lasted two-and-a-half years before I decided I was ready to take another risk and join a start up in Washington, DC.

But fortunately, this time around, taking a risk wasn’t going to be so scary.

And that’s one of the lessons every city girl should learn: the biggest risk you can take in your career is not to take any risks at all.


Welcome to lessons from a city girl. Read my ongoing series here on Medium, recommend it to friends, and share your own stories in the comments.

Written by

Lessons from a city girl: New York, DC, SF. Follow along   @JenNedeau. #citygirl

Updated December 22, 2013

Published in

Go to How To Succeed

How To Succeed

Stories, how-to’s, guides and interviews on how to succeed at life.

 

To Beat China, the Navy Could Launch Tiny Spy Drones From Submarines


Three-inch robot could spot targets for cruise missiles

by DAVID AXE

One of the biggest problems with submarines is that they’re, well, submarines. Spending most of their time alone and underwater, there’s no easy way for subs to communicate with other forces to get the latest updates on the enemy’s location.

Undersea vessels’ stealth and firepower make them by far the most powerful warships for full-scale war. Solve the comms problem and they become even deadlier.

Hence the Navy’s new three-year science project. The Advanced Weapons Enhanced by Submarine UAS Against Mobile Targets program—a.k.a. “Awesum”—is developing a small Unmanned Aerial System that can be launched from below the waves and fly for up to an hour, spotting targets and relaying their coordinates back to the sub via a special radio signal aimed at the sub’s above-water mast.

Rear Adm. David Johnson, who oversees U.S. sub production, detailed Awesum in an October presentation in Virginia.

In testing until 2015, Awesum is meant to provide “target solution for over-the-horizon, third-party strike” in an “anti-access, area-denial environment,” according to Johnson.

Translated into English, that means the tiny robot should be able to sneak hundreds of miles through enemy air defenses and pinpoint the bad guys so that the submarine can take them out with cruise missiles. All without the sub breaking cover.

Awesum, a three-inch wide, cylindrical drone with a tiny battery-powered propeller and pop-out wings, is launched through the water and into the air via the same small tubes that subs use to deploy underwater noisemaker decoys. Flying for up to an hour, guided by GPS, the ‘bot beams back data to the launching vessel’s OE-538 radio mast, which the sub crew can poke just above the surface for short periods of time.

Navy art

According to Johnson, Awesum drones can be launched in succession along the same path to form a “daisy chain,” each tiny drone relaying radio signals from the one ahead of it in order to bend the datalink over the horizon back to the sub.

This stealthy targeting wasn’t possible before. For decades subs have carried long-range cruise missiles for destroying targets on land. But there was no elegant way for an undersea vessel to figure out where to aim the weapons.

A sub usually entered a war zone with targets’ coordinates pre-loaded. To get an update, an undersea boat had to spend vulnerable minutes with its mast above water, receiving large amounts of info from friendly ships, planes or satellites.

To remain hidden in enemy waters, subs need to be able to gather targeting data on their own—and discreetly.

The targeting problem has become more acute in recent years as Washington shifts its naval forces to the Pacific to confront an increasingly belligerent and heavily-armed China. Beijing’s sophisticated complex of mobile radars and long-range missiles form a kind of no-go zone for American ships and planes that extends a thousand miles or more from the Chinese coast.

Only submarines are stealthy enough to get close to these land-based defenses and take them out, clearing a way for other U.S. forces to attack. But to find these on-the-move Chinese defenders, subs need drones. Robots “will provide submarines a fully organic capability to detect, identify, precisely locate and quickly strike,” Owen Cote, a submarine expert at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, wrote in a 2011 paper.

If Awesum works as advertised, the Navy could add them to its roughly 50 attack submarines starting in just a few years, transforming the subs into free-ranging cruise-missile strikers. And with bigger and better subs being planned, bigger and better sub-launched drones might not be far behind.

Sign up for a daily War is Boring email update here. Subscribe to WIB’s RSS feed here and follow the main page here.

Further Reading

How I Lost the Battle of the South China Sea

 — We gamed out a clash between the U.S. Navy’s latest ships and the Chinese Navy. Guess who won.

How to Sink an Aircraft Carrier

 — Sneak up in a submarine, is how

Now We Know What the Navy’s Next Submarine Will Look Like

 — Admiral reveals five possible future sub designs

Written by

David Axe goes to war so you don’t have to.

 

Defying Washington to Save the Internet


A new communications bill in Congress actual serves the interests of Internet users. And that’s why it faces long odds.

 

Co-authored by S. Derek Turner

It’s a rarity in Washington to see a communications bill that actually serves the public.

But a bill Sen. Jay Rockefeller introduced last week is a direct challenge to the communications cabal that controls much of our media in the United States.

For that the Consumer Choice in Online Video Act faces very long odds. But Rockefeller’s bill does so much for Internet users and video watchers that it deserves everyone’s support.

Sen. Rockefeller, who is serving out his final term in Congress, has clearly been emboldened by the open Internet movement. Over the past decade, millions of people have spoken out to preserve Net Neutrality, stop online censorship and protect our rights to connect and communicate. We recognize the power of free speech and access to information that the Internet enables, and we’re using the Internet in growing numbers to protect these rights against corporate and governmental abuse.

Gatekeepers have historically stood in the way of open communications. Some of this gatekeeping happened for technical reasons, some for autocratic reasons, but much existed simply because gatekeeping is profitable.

The open Internet threatens this traditional business model. It’s a distribution platform that eradicates all other monopoly distribution platforms. In recent years, the companies that control Internet access — including AT&T, Comcast and Verizon — have stepped up efforts in Washington to undermine protections for Internet users and gain control of the network.

Building New Barriers to Video Watching

Thanks to the open Internet and the dozens of free voice and video-calling apps that use it, the days of having to pay Ma Bell $5 per minute to call long distance are long gone. And even though the right to record is under assault, anyone with a smartphone and an Internet connection can act as a citizen journalist — and reach an audience of millions.

But just as fast as the Internet tears down old barriers, gatekeepers scramble to build new ones. Nowhere is this more evident than in the video market, the one area the Internet has yet to completely disrupt.

When Congress last overhauled our communications law in 1996, we were promised that the Internet, as a neutral delivery platform, would eradicate cable’s stranglehold on the video market. But today the cable monopolists are stronger than ever, and folks looking for alternatives are faced with a maze of cumbersome and often inadequate choices.

For most people, the cable company is also the Internet service provider. And that company isn’t keen to see customers use their broadband connections to reach other video providers.

Cable has a history of blocking apps that deliver video, imposing unnecessary and pricey limits on the amount of data customers can consume, and favoring their own video contentover that of their online rivals.

Policymakers with the power to stop these anti-competitive practices have stood by while gatekeepers created new barriers to video competition, stifling innovation and limiting what users can do with their Internet connections. And Congress hasn’t been willing to challenge the cable cabal.

Until now.

Where the Internet is stored
Where the Internet is stored (Photo credit: debs)

A Bill for New Media Users

Rockefeller’s bill tears down most of the blockades gatekeepers are using to protect their legacy monopolies. And it goes further than that, giving the Federal Communications Commission the power to make rules that guarantee people can access video content via a truly open and competitive network.

The bill notes the substantial First Amendment interest in “promoting a diversity of views” — and in preventing ISPs from discriminating against other content providers.

The bill also includes many findings that regulators and politicians beholden to industry are loath to acknowledge. For example, it states that ISPs’ growing use of data caps “can negatively impact the competitive position of online video distributors and the appeal of their services to consumers.”

The bill also notes that ISPs “have an increased incentive to degrade the delivery of, or block entirely, traffic from the websites of other online video distributors, or speed up or favor” their own content, because “online video distributors pose a threat” to ISPs’ own video businesses.

Rockefeller’s bill makes it illegal for any ISP to “block, degrade, or otherwise impair any content provided by an online video distributor,” and defines such distributors to include anyone from the tiniest nonprofit outlet to online giants like Netflix and Apple.

But it doesn’t stop there. The legislation prohibits ISPs from using underhanded tactics to “deter competition.” And to ensure that ISPs don’t play games, the law requires any provider that has data caps to use certified meters and fully disclose these practices to consumers before they sign up.

And in barring ISPs from favoring their own video content, the Consumer Choice in Online Video Act also closes one of the biggest loopholes in the FCC’s Open Internet rules, the so-called “specialized services” exception.

Rockefeller’s bill outlaws many of the practices the industry uses to prevent online companies from accessing content. The bill bars cable companies from using contracts that prevent content owners from selling to online distributors, a practice that Time Warner Cable’s CEO recently admitted was a common tactic used to squash competition.

Sending a Signal to Washington

The legislation doesn’t offer Internet users complete protections against Net Neutrality violations since it pertains only to video. But Sen. Rockefeller’s willingness to buck industry pressures to kill off Net Neutrality sends a strong signal that preserving the free and open Internet is a legislative priority.

Rockefeller’s bill contains many other public interest protections. Earlier this year when CBS and Time Warner Cable were squabbling over retransmission fees, CBS blocked all TWC Internet users from accessing video content on CBS’ Web portal, content that anyone else could view. The legislation outlaws this practice of punishing innocent customers caught in the middle of industry food fights.

It also bars content owners from forcing online distributors to buy a bundle of unwanted channels just to purchase a single in-demand channel. Companies like Viacom use this tactic to force people who want to watch Comedy Central to also pay for unpopular networks like CMT Pure Country or TeenNick.

Internet!
Internet! (Photo credit: LarsZi)

The Consumer Choice in Online Video Act is a dream for online users and a cable CEO’s worst nightmare — which is why many D.C. insiders think the bill has little chance of becoming law.

That speaks volumes about our broken Congress. Washington’s conventional wisdom is that industry dictates public policy. But we aren’t counting Rockefeller out.

It’s no coincidence that he introduced this far-reaching legislation one year before his retirement. But Sen. Rockefeller still chairs the committee with the best chance of taking on the cable cabal’s political power.

And if the growing Internet rights movement mobilizes behind Rockefeller, we can blow past these gatekeepers and pass the Consumer Choice in Online Video Act.

 

Written by

All things media, online and off… but mostly on. Karr is an online, free speech advocate at Free Press, the nation’s largest media reform group. Tweets my own

 

 

 

White House review panel proposes curbs on some NSA programs


By Warren Strobel and Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON Wed Dec 18, 2013 9:21pm EST

  • inShare7
  • Share this
  • Email
  • Print
U.S. President Barack Obama speaks about the economy at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress in Washington December 4, 2013. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama speaks about the economy at an event hosted by the Center for American Progress in Washington December 4, 2013.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

(Reuters) – A White House-appointed panel on Wednesday proposed curbs on some key National Security Agency surveillance operations, recommending limits on a program to collect records of billions of telephone calls and new tests before Washington spies on foreign leaders.

keep reading -> http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/19/us-usa-surveillance-obama-idUSBRE9BG1AQ20131219

 

Biden on delicate mission to defuse tensions in East Asia


(Reuters) – U.S. Vice President Joe Biden will seek a delicate balance between calming military tensions with China and backing ally Japan against Beijing on a trip to Asia this week that is being overshadowed by a territorial row in the East China Sea.

 

Official portrait of Vice President of the Uni...
Official portrait of Vice President of the United States . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Japan reiterated on Monday that Tokyo and Washington had both rejected Beijing’s move to set up an air defense zone that includes islands at the heart of a bitter Sino-Japanese feud – despite the fact that three U.S. airlines, acting on government advice, are notifyingChina of plans to transit the zone.

 

Washington said over the weekend this did not mean U.S. acceptance of the zone, and last week sent two B-52 bombers into the area without informing China.

 

read more – > http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/12/02/us-japan-china-biden-idUSBRE9B00H620131202

 

 

 

Iran Nuclear Deal Reached At Geneva Talks


From the AP:

 

Image representing Associated Press as depicte...
Image via CrunchBase

 

Iran struck a historic nuclear deal Sunday with the United States and five other world powers, in the most significant development between Washington and Tehran in more than three decades of estrangement between the two nations.
Related Stories

 

The agreement commits Iran to curb its nuclear activities in exchange for limited and gradual sanctions relief. It builds on the momentum of the dialogue opened during September’s annual U.N. gathering, which included a 15-minute phone conversation between President Barack Obama and Iran’s new president, Hassan Rouhani.

 

It marks a milestone between the two countries, which broke diplomatic ties 34 years ago when Iran’s Islamic revolution climaxed in the storming of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran. Since then, relations between the two countries have been frigid to hostile — until the recent outreach between the two presidents.

 

source

 

read more -> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/11/23/iran-nuclear-deal_n_4331281.html